Damage Steering in Architecture and Structures: The Efficiency of Vertical Links in Enhancing Building Resilience and Repairability
Abstract
Conventional earthquake-resistant systems often undergo permanent deformations during severe seismic events, leading to the formation of plastic hinges throughout most parts of the structure. This condition makes the reuse of the building impossible, and consequently, total demolition and reconstruction become inevitable—an approach that is neither economically, environmentally, nor architecturally sustainable. In recent years, inspired by the concept of “damage steering,” researchers have sought to concentrate damage in predetermined locations so that, through repair or replacement, the building remains reusable. One of the most innovative systems in this regard is the rocking frame concept. The present study investigates the efficiency of this system in steel-braced frames equipped with vertical links, focusing on how rocking mechanisms can reduce structural responses after earthquakes. The results indicate that employing eccentric bracing with vertical links significantly enhances ductility and energy dissipation, although the rocking mechanism imposes some limitations on these improvements. These findings are significant not only from a structural engineering perspective but also for architecture: preserving spatial and functional qualities after seismic events, enabling continued occupancy, and reducing the need for complete demolition. Accordingly, such systems can play a crucial role in achieving sustainable and resilient architecture.
Keywords:
Vertical link, Seismic resilience, Damage steering, Rocking mechanism, Sustainable architectureReferences
- [1] Zamordian, M. J. (2014). Geomorphology of Iran–Climatic processes. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. (In Persian). https://www.gisoom.com/book
- [2] Darvishzadeh, A. (1984). Geology of Iran. Ministry of Education Publications. (In Persian). https://telketab.com/book/
- [3] Cook, D. T. (2021). Advancing performance-based earthquake engineering for modern resilience objectives [Thesis]. https://www.proquest.com/openview/eafe3d63eba98f73dd754dba951dedb9/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
- [4] Building & Housing Research Center. (2007). Iranian code for seismic resistant design of buildings. https://iisee.kenken.go.jp/worldlist/26_Iran/Iran National Seismic Code_2007_3rd Version_English.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
- [5] Building & Housing Research Center. (2014). Iranian code for seismic resistant design of buildings. https://iisee.kenken.go.jp/worldlist/26_Iran/Iran%20National%20Seismic%20Code_2007_3rd%20Version_English.pdf
- [6] Xu, X., Huang, L., Liu, S., Zhang, B., & Hu, S. (2025). Seismic Performance Analysis for an Eccentrically Braced Frame (EBF) with an Innovative Self-Centering Shear Link. Buildings, 15(9), 1471. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15091471
- [7] Popovski, M. (2000). Seismic performance of braced timber frames [Thesis]. https://open.library.ubc.ca/soa/cIRcle/collections/ubctheses/831/items/1.0064074?utm_source=chatgpt.com
- [8] Shendri, C. N., Tjahjanto, H. H., Nugroho, W. O., & Pratiwi, N. (2025). Inelastic behavior of eccentrically braced frames with vertical links: a numerical study. Rekayasa sipil, 19(1), 58–66.
- [9] Hjelmstad, K. D. (1984). Seismic behavior of active beam links in eccentrically braced frames. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=7402020
- [10] Malley, J. O., & Popov, E. P. (1983). Design considerations for shear links in eccentrically braced frames. https://nehrpsearch.nist.gov/static/files/NSF/PB84192186.pdf
- [11] Okazaki, T., Arce, G., Ryu, H. C., & Engelhardt, M. D. (2005). Experimental study of local buckling, overstrength, and fracture of links in eccentrically braced frames. Journal of structural engineering, 131(10), 1526–1535. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:10(1526)
- [12] Zahraei, S. M., & Moslehitabar, A. (2006). Cyclic behaviour of steel braced frames having shear panel system. Asian journal of civil engineering (building and housing), 7(1), 13-26. https://www.sid.ir/EN/VEWSSID/J_pdf/103820060107.pdf
- [13] Richards, P. W., & Uang, C. M. (2006). Testing protocol for short links in eccentrically braced frames. Journal of structural engineering, 132(8), 1183–1191. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:8(1183)
- [14] Di Sarno, L., Pecce, M. R., & Fabbrocino, G. (2007). Inelastic response of composite steel and concrete base column connections. Journal of constructional steel research, 63(6), 819–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2006.08.007
- [15] AISC. (2002). Seismic provisions for structural steel buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction. https://www.aisc.org/globalassets/aisc/publications/standards/a341-22w.pdf
- [16] Hu, G. (2011). Behavior of beam shear connections in steel buildings subject to fire [Thesis]. https://repositories.lib.utexas.edu/bitstreams/a6145c93-17e0-472e-ae28-d80a993b6041/download
- [17] Zahrai, M., & Mahroozadeh, Y. (2010). Experimental study of using vertical link beam to improve seismic performance of steel buildings. Journal of civil and surveying engineering, 44(3), 379-393. https://jcse.ut.ac.ir/article_21289_en.html
- [18] Newmark, N. M., & Hall, W. J. (1982). Earthquake spectra and design. Engineering monographs on earthquake criteria. https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1982esd..book.....N/abstract