Intergenerational Integration in Living Space Design: A Solution for Improving the Quality of Life of the Elderly and Orphaned Children
Keywords:
Intergenerational integration, Elderly, Orphaned children, Environmental design, Quality of life, Ergonomic and accessible living spaces, Spatial communication in elderly designAbstract
In this century, profound social and economic changes have significantly impacted the lives of individuals, requiring special attention to vulnerable groups such as the elderly and orphaned children. Older people serve as a valuable source of knowledge and experience for society, while orphaned children face multiple challenges due to the lack of emotional and social support. In this context, intergenerational integration between these two groups can act as an effective strategy to improve their emotional and social well-being. This model not only enhances the quality of life for older people but also meets the emotional needs of children, enriching the experience of shared living. Intergenerational integration is the interaction and cooperation between different generations within a social space. Given the increasing elderly population, the necessity of designing environments that align with the needs of this group becomes more apparent. Older people typically face challenges such as mobility limitations, loneliness, and the need for social support. Therefore, the design of living spaces must ensure safety and comfort while fostering social interactions and psychological support. Architects and urban designers should consider older people's anthropological and psychological needs and modernize the design requirements of residential and social centers. This research aims to identify the design needs for elderly spaces, analyze ergonomic design principles and their impact on quality of life, assess the effect of the environment on the well-being of older people, and provide recommendations for enhancing space design with a focus on the participation of elderly individuals. These activities can improve the quality of life for older people and create a supportive environment for orphaned children, thereby strengthening social cohesion.
References
Organization, W. H. (2015). World report on ageing and health. World Health Organization. https://books.google.com/books
Gualano, M. R., Voglino, G., Bert, F., Thomas, R., Camussi, E., & Siliquini, R. (2018). The impact of intergenerational programs on children and older adults: A review. International psychogeriatrics, 30(4), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104161021700182X
Wahl, H.-W., Oswald, F., & others. (2010). Environmental perspectives on ageing. The sage handbook of social gerontology, 124, 111. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/4913737#page=138
Steinfeld, E., & Maisel, J. (2012). Universal design: Creating inclusive environments. John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.com/books
Harrington, C. N., Jelen, B., Lazar, A., Martin-Hammond, A., Pradhan, A., Reeder, B., & Siek, K. (2021). Taking stock of the present and future of smart technologies for older adults and caregivers. ArXiv preprint arxiv:2104.00096. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.00096
Persson, H., Åhman, H., Yngling, A. A., & Gulliksen, J. (2015). Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: different concepts—one goal? On the concept of accessibility—historical, methodological and philosophical aspects. Universal access in the information society, 14, 505–526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0358-z%0A%0A
Basner, M., & McGuire, S. (2018). WHO environmental noise guidelines for the European region: a systematic review on environmental noise and effects on sleep. International journal of environmental research and public health, 15(3), 519. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15030519
Boyce, P. R. (2003). Human factors in lighting. Crc press. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.1201/9780203426340/human-factors-lighting-peter-robert-boyce
Kent, J. (2023). ADA in details: interpreting the 2010 Americans with disabilities act standards for accessible design. John Wiley & Sons. https://books.google.com/books
Coburn, A., Kardan, O., Kotabe, H., Steinberg, J., Hout, M. C., Robbins, A., … Berman, M. G. (2019). Psychological responses to natural patterns in architecture. Journal of environmental psychology, 62, 133–145. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.02.007
Lee, Y., Hwang, J., Lim, S., & Kim, J. T. (2013). Identifying characteristics of design guidelines for elderly care environments from the holistic health perspective. Indoor and built environment, 22(1), 242–259. https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X12471101
Rezaei, M., Emmanuel, N., Kim, J., & Kim, D. H. (2021). Analyzing the impact of green roof functions on the citizens’ mental health in metropolitan cities. Iranian journal of public health, 50(5), 900-907. https://doi.org/10.18502/ijph.v50i5.6107
Matloob, H. (2024). Towards Sustainable Architecture: Exploring Innovative Materials, Construction Technology, and Design Concepts for Eco-Friendly Buildings. Engineering headway, 11, 35–43. https://doi.org/10.4028/p-wB5308